Capture structured feedback where decisions happen.
Threaded comments attach directly to elements, states, and flow steps for precise feedback and faster resolution.
Problem
Generalized feedback channels produce vague comments that are disconnected from specific screens and UI decisions.
What is threaded comments?
Threaded comments attach structured, context-rich feedback directly to wireframe elements rather than scattering notes across email, Slack, and meeting recordings. Each thread captures a discussion, tracks resolution status, and preserves decision rationale — turning review cycles into documented decisions.
How threaded comments works in practice
Click on any wireframe element — a button, a form field, a navigation section, a state transition — and start a comment thread. The thread stays anchored to that specific element, so when the team reviews comments later, every piece of feedback has visual context. Thread status tracks from open through in-discussion to resolved, making it clear which feedback needs attention and which decisions are closed. When a thread is resolved, the resolution rationale is captured alongside the discussion so future team members can understand why specific decisions were made. Comments can be filtered by author role, status, and screen section to support different review workflows: PMs review scope-related threads, designers review interaction threads, and engineering reviews feasibility threads. Key decisions from resolved threads can be exported directly into handoff documentation so the reasoning behind design choices travels with the implementation spec.
Typical workflow
- 1Comment on specific screen elements
- 2Track thread status from open to resolved
- 3Capture rationale on final decisions
- 4Export key decisions into handoff docs
Best fit for
- Teams with multi-round review cycles that need faster resolution
- Products with complex stakeholder feedback dynamics
- Organizations where decision rationale must be documented for compliance
Use-case examples
- Collect element-level feedback on a checkout flow during async review
- Track and resolve design decision threads before sprint commitment
Why teams choose Threaded Comments
Precise discussion context
Comments attached to specific wireframe elements eliminate the ambiguity of feedback like 'the form needs work.' Every comment points to exactly what needs changing, why, and where in the flow it applies.
Clear decision ownership
Each thread can be assigned to a specific owner responsible for resolution. This prevents the common pattern where feedback floats in a shared channel and nobody drives it to a conclusion.
Faster feedback resolution
Threaded discussion keeps related feedback grouped instead of scattered across Slack messages, email threads, and meeting notes. Resolving feedback takes fewer round-trips because all context is in one place.
Less duplicate debate
When resolved threads preserve decision rationale, teams stop relitigating settled decisions. New stakeholders can read the resolution context instead of reopening discussions that were already closed.
Comparison snapshot
How this feature compares with generic approaches in broad design tools.
| Evaluation area | Generic tooling | WireframeTool |
|---|---|---|
| Feedback precision | Vague comments without screen context | Comments attached to specific elements |
| Resolution tracking | Open items lost in general channels | Thread status from open to resolved |
| Decision rationale | Why a choice was made is undocumented | Rationale captured in resolved threads |
| Review efficiency | Multiple meetings to close feedback | Asynchronous resolution with clear status |
Explore matching templates and guides
Get early access for Threaded Comments
Share your stack and use case so we can prioritize the right onboarding path.